Consubstantiality in the Holy Trinity – Intentions to Be Prayed Through

Consubstantiality – sharing the same nature[1]. In Christian theology, a term describing the relationship between the persons of the Holy Trinity. In particular, it specified the existence of the Father and the Son on the same temporal level and as having the same nature, where the Son had no beginning and there was never a time when the Son did not exist. In this sense, the Son was placed in the same position as the Father Himself.

The profession of faith adopted by the First Council of Nicaea in 325 defines faith in the Son of God—the true God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father (homoousios). This teaching was further developed by the Council of Chalcedon in 451. So much from Wikipedia.

The first two sentences contradict the 2nd Commandment of the Decalogue and strengthen idolatrous forces within Christianity. They were ultimately sanctioned only in 1917 through a change in the wording of this very commandment into the form known today by most Catholics.

Below are several thematic intentions

Technical matters concerning the concept and the construction of sentences when working with intentions.

Article “800 Intentions to Be Cleansed” Link

“Constructing Extensive Intentions and Prayers. A Skype Conversation About the Technique” Link

“A One-Sentence Template for Working with Intentions.” Link

The word
(–not) added to a particular word when working with intentions means that it is worth mentioning its opposite or even, during the work itself, independently finding and expressing any synonyms that come to mind together with their opposites.

For example—being poor, ill—it is also advisable to say it together with its opposite

—being poor, ill, —not being poor, ill

This makes it possible immediately to move a given pattern as broadly as possible in different aspects, including in its opposite. It is also worth knowing that Souls often think and claim that they do not have such opposite patterns, for example that they are not idolaters, as in a given case or with a given word.

Another example:

A woman’s Soul denies ever having been a bad mother. Therefore, adding the word of negation here—not being a bad mother—may enable her to understand the state in which she finds herself.

Being a bad mother, —not being a bad mother—

“But of course not, never in my life! These are not my patterns. What I do is my private matter.”—This is what a soul very often says or thinks about itself.]

Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas which establish the existence of God the Father and His Son Jesus on the same temporal level and as having the same nature, where Jesus had no beginning and there was never a time when Jesus did not exist, and not only this, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this

Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas which create beliefs that, among other things, God’s Son Jesus was placed in the same position as His God the Father Himself, and not only this, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this

Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas which establish the existence of God the Father and His children, various deities, gods, goddesses, Goa’uld, and not only these, on the same temporal level and as having the same nature, where all deities and gods have no beginning and there was never a time when they did not exist, and not only this, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this

Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas which create beliefs that, among other things, various deities, goddesses and gods are in the same or a higher position than God Himself, and not only this, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this.

Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas that all binding and entangling chemical processes, including those understood as homogeneous and arising as a result of homogenisation, which occurred in relationships with other people, souls, beings, deities, and not only these, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this.

This post has 1 comment

• s_majda says:28/07/2019 at 21:35Our own, and through us other people’s, among other things, creating, inventing, promoting and experiencing ideas that one should profess that Jesus Christ, while being one person, possesses two natures, Divine and human (Dyophysitism), and that their union took place without change of the natures (immutabiliter, Greek: atreptos), meaning that the encounter of the Divine and human natures in Jesus Christ did not alter either the human or the Divine nature in any way, where each remained itself with its own specific properties, and not only this, as well as-without confusion (inconfuse, Greek: asynchytos), meaning that the two natures of Jesus Christ, after their union, did not become confused with one anotherand that no third Divine-human nature arose, because two distinct natures remained, Divine and human, and each of them retained its own specific properties.-and without division (indivise, Greek: adiairetos), meaning that despite the presence of two natures in Jesus Christ after the Incarnation, there were not two persons but one person, Jesus Christ, in whom Divinity and humanity met,-and that no one is permitted to separate Jesus Christ the God from Jesus Christ the man-and without separation (inseparabiliter, Greek: achoristos), meaning that after the Ascension of Jesus Christ the human nature did not separate from the Divine nature-and that Jesus Christ, also after the Ascension, remained fully God and fully man, and not only this, as well as our own/other people’s experiencing/not experiencing all the consequences of this.

Opublikowano: 03/09/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: Religions, priests, sects, idolatry, vows.

Komentarze