Masculinity as a Congenital Defect, Part 2 – intentions of a man

Authors: Sławomir Majda, Małgorzata Krata. The identical recurring fragment, forming the core of the idea, is as follows:“experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times”.

Organized freeing oneself from burdens – links to texts, information about recordings, working with intentions, the bow technique >Link.

Technical issues concerning the idea and the construction of sentences when working with intentions.
Art. “800 intentions for cleansing” Link.“One-sentence scheme for intentions.”Link.
Film “The bow after performing intentions” Link.

The word “–not” added to some word while working with intentions means that it is worth expressing it also in its opposite, or even finding and saying aloud any synonyms that come to mind together with their opposites. For example — when saying: being poor, being sick, it is good to say it also with its opposite:–being poor, being sick, –not being poor, not being sick. This allows you to move a given pattern as broadly as possible, touching different aspects, including its opposite. It is also worth knowing that Souls often think or claim that they do not have such opposite patterns — for example, that they are not idolaters in a given case (in a given word). Another example: A woman’s Soul denies ever being a bad mother. Therefore, adding here the negating form — not being a bad mother — may allow her to understand the state she is in. Being a bad mother, –not being a bad mother–“—Oh, absolutely not, never in my life! These are certainly not my patterns. What I do is my private matter.” [—The Soul very often says or thinks this about itself.]

1. our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, trust, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from God Himself, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

2. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all genders of humans, Souls, beings, entities, constructs, animals, plants, extraterrestrials and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

3. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, all kinds, meanings, species, genders and forms of existence of, among others, active and inactive deities, goddesses, divine mothers, divine fathers, divine sons, divine daughters, divine families, Goa’ulds, associates of God, gods, demigods, Asuras, Saints, gurus, masters, teachers, Messiahs, angels, including astral among others Archangels, cherubim, seraphim, astrals, rulers, administrators, owners and creators of astral worlds and soul trees, prophets, and environments acting independently or through intermediaries and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

4. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, physical and astral snakes, worms, predators, viruses, pests, fungi, mold, insects, microorganisms, bacteria, microorganisms and macroorganisms, reptiles, parasites, symbionts, inhabitants of our and others’ energetics, as well as from, among others, all spirits, demons, strzygas, possessing entities, mythical creatures, mythical beings and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

5. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, our and others’ all kinds of miracle workers, healers, folk healers, bioenergy therapists, doctors of body and Soul, of miraculous divine healings, from owners, administrators, fanatics and structures of various initiatory practices, among others religious, parareligious and such as Reiki, from witches, magicians, shamans, visionaries, oracles, from signs in heaven and on earth, from sorceresses, sorcerers, from magic, from elements, yogis, tantrics, and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

6. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, all those establishing criteria of purity, guilt, merit and readiness, including the enlightened, those enlightening, whitening and correspondingly blackening themselves and others, among others humans, Souls, beings, parts of our and others’ Soul and being, from those striving for nirvana, for salvation, liberation, redemption, achieving them, from admirers and creators of all astral compressions, all heavens, hells, paradises, purgatories, astral worlds and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this,

7. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, all atheists, agnostics, heretics, followers of Baháʼí, tribal religions, polytheism, animism, totemism, Taoism, Shintō, Sikhism, Jainism, ahimsa, Ayyavazhi, followers of Wicca, followers of Buddhism, druidism, voodoo, Theravāda, Mahāyāna, Chan, Zen, Sŏn, Amidism, Pure Land School, Tendai, Shingon, Tibetan Buddhism, Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya, Jonang, Gelug, Bon and not only, as well as from their priests, creators, followers, promoters and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

8. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, Jesus, the Apostles, the Church Fathers, All Saints, the Our Father, the Holy Spirit, as well as, among others, followers, creators, priests and administrators of all Christian sects, among others Old Catholicism, the Utrecht Churches, national churches, Mariavitism, Catholicism, Eastern Catholicism, Greek Catholicism, the Roman Catholic Church, sedevacantism, conclavism, Palmarianism, Lefebvrists, Anglicanism, Orthodoxy, from Byzantine churches, Orthodox churches, Old Believers, Popovtsy, Bezpopovtsy, Skoptsy, Old Calendarists, Oriental churches, Copts, Syriacs, Assyrian churches, Adventists, Millerism, Anabaptism, followers of Arianism, Baptism, Moravian Brethren, Plymouth Brethren, Hussitism, Calvinism, Congregationalism, Presbyterianism, Quakers, Lutheranism, Mennonitism, Methodism, Pentecostalism, Salvationism, Unitarianism, Waldensians, Amish, Restorationism, the Bábí movement, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Association of Free Bible Students, Holy Missionary Movements, followers of Unitarianism, Mormons, Churches of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Community of Christ, Afro-Christianity such as Aladura, Harrism, Kimbanguism, Lumba and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

9. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, followers, creators, priests and administrators of, among others, cosmologies, ascetic practices, concepts of purity and defilement, enslavement, including, among others, Jainism, Digambaras, Sthanakavasis, Śvetāmbaras, Gnostics, followers of Manichaeism, Mandaeism, from all branches and sects, among others, Vaishnavism, Krishnaism, Shaivism, Lingayats, Shaktism, Mazdaism, Persian religions, Mazdakism, Mithraism and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

10. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from followers, creators, priests and administrators of the world of Islam, among others Alawites, Alevis, Kharijites, Sunnis, Shiites, Imamis, Ismailis, Zaydis, followers of Sufism, Ahmadiyya, Black Islam, Moors, the Nation of Islam, Druzism, Ahl-e-Haqq, Zikris, scripturalism, Quranism, Yazidism and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

11. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, promoters, creators, priests and followers of all sects and factions of Judaism, among others Falashas called Black Jews, Messianic Judaism including Hasidic, Conservative, Orthodox, Progressive, Reconstructionist Judaism, Karaimism, Mosaicism, Samaritanism and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

12. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, creators, organizers, administrators and followers of so-called new religious, spiritual and parareligious movements, charismatic such as, among others, Bábism, Baháʼí, Cheondoism, Cao Dai, Shakers, Cargo Cults, Falun Gong, Modekngei, New Age, Realism, Rastafari, Scientology, Quan Yin Method, Wicca, “I Am,” Asatru, Hellenism, Slavic Native Faith, International Intelligent Yoga, Transcendental Meditation, Divine Light Mission, International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Neo-Sannyas (Osho), Radha Soami, Sathya Sai Baba, Swaminarayan Faith, Harrism, Confucianism, Santería, Sikhism, Shinto, Taoism, Zoroastrianism and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

13. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from promoters, creators, priests, administrators and followers of all, among others, beliefs, religions, sects and factions, as well as inhabitants of supercontinents, continents and prehistoric, primal and mythical lands such as, among others, Pangaea, Gondwana, Atlantis, Lemuria, Mu, Gobi, native religions of Africa, Australia, Oceania, Asia, Europe, the Americas and other places on Earth and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

14. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, all kinds of tyrants, despots, sociopaths, executioners, terrorists, blackmailers, judges, lawyers, prosecutors, accusers, masters, rulers, superiors, supervisors, employers, co-workers, clients, payers, manipulators, hypnotists, kings, princes, courts, advisors, messengers, notaries, secretaries, structures of state, religious and administrative authority, as well as from all creators and promoters of various destructive inventions and practices, including such as implanted substances, viruses, parasites, bio-robots, artifacts, as well as games and plays such as Jumanji, the Infinity Stones, the Rings of Power, Game of Thrones and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

15. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds of civilizations, among others carbon-based, silicon-based, crystalline, energetic, material, as well as, among others, all planets, constellations, cosmos, stars, moons, comets, asteroids, galaxies, cosmic dust, black holes, suns, celestial bodies, from their movements, positions, influences, among others gravitational, energetic, radioactive and symbolic, as well as all, among others, their owners, administrators, creators, tenants, users and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

16. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds, sizes and meanings of our and others’, among others, amulets, talismans, garments, artifacts, gadgets, objects and instruments, plasma, musical, magical and non-magical, from rings, seals, wands, elixirs, herbs, smokes, incenses, songs, mantras, sacred texts, plants, animals, divination methods, rituals, superstitions, from Holy Communion, from offerings made to someone or something, devotional items, images, figures, sculptures, paintings, states of intoxication, sacraments, drugs, sweets, addictions, alcohols, spiritual and physical ecstasies, shamanism, mysticism, all utopias, escape from reality or submission to promises of fulfillment, salvation, power or perfection and not only, as well as, among others, all kinds of their creators, promoters, owners, users, beneficiaries and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

17. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds, sizes and meanings of, among others, all forms and causes of enslavements, confinements, entanglements such as, among others, nets, ropes, chains, leashes, collars, cells, prisons, cages, hooks, stocks, restraints, pyramids, protomolecules, structures operating openly or covertly, temporarily or permanently, locally or systemically, their equivalents, substitutes and not only, as well as all, among others, their enthusiasts, creators, promoters, beneficiaries, victims, guards, witnesses and followers and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

18. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds and sizes of, among others, rituals, cults, nominations, anointments, permissions, guidelines, agreements, oaths, promises, contracts, orders, prohibitions, bonds, missions, vows, pacts, acts, arrangements, treaties, other forms of formal or symbolic binding of will, functioning through granting binding power to a given word, gesture or act, through sanctioning obedience and disobedience, regulating access, status and responsibility, reinforcing dependencies through promise, threat, reward or punishment, as well as normalizing subordination as law, duty, mission or destiny and not only, as well as all, among others, their creators, promoters, beneficiaries, priests, guards, victims, witnesses and followers and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

19. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from our own and others’, including licensed, among others, guards, verifiers, collectors, mediators, bailiffs, intermediaries, witnesses, creators, founders, security personnel, representatives of opposition, censors, promoters, beneficiaries, victims of our and others’ actions, intentions, manifestations and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

20. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, all kinds, sizes, meanings, genders, races, species of, among others, parents, caregivers, dependents, teachers, spouses, lovers, children, siblings, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, cousins, entire lineages, families, communities, social strata, grandfathers, grandmothers, relatives and non-relatives, from persons of the same or different gender, as well as from our and others’, among others, elements of physical and energetic structure, organs, tissues, cells, atoms, converters, systems and assemblies, biological, physical, chemical, energetic, clock-based, digital, their mechanisms of operation, feedback loops and boundary states, all programs controlling them at all levels, spaces, planes, elements and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

21. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, beliefs, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds, meanings, ranks, levels, genders of, among others, associations, brotherhoods, communities, communes, schools, unions, organizations, collective structures, including, among others, administrative, military, civil, secular, medical, financial, religious, messianic, spiritual, economic, public, political, criminal, intelligence, sexual, drug-related, alcoholic, state, global, cosmic, multidimensional, spacetime and not only, and not experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

22. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, weather, nature, elements, the time of day and night, the season, date, calendars, astrology, astronomy, numerology, meteorology, ambient temperature, pressure, frequencies, cycles, colors, sounds, rhythms, vibrations, humidity, the height of the Sun in the sky, from the factor of time and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

23. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, our and others’ codings, from thought-forms, blockages, burdens, patterns, points of view, ways of understanding, from entanglements, crosses and karmic knots, from karmic figures, relationships, schemes, from conspiracies of silence, from planetary cycles, from the wheel of karma, from the wheel of fortune, from flat and spatial geometric figures, from anomalies, from mirror reflections, from fate, chance, accumulation, from lotteries, statistics, feedback loops, from luck, bad luck, curses, spells, letters, words, signs, symbols, digits, numbers, alphabets, mandalas, tattoos, from confirmation effects, from repositories of burdens and patterns, from determinants, ornaments, chips, injuries, disabilities, diseases, from emptiness, vacuum, nothingness in the mind and life, as well as from their producers, promoters, victims, beneficiaries and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

24. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this through the normalization of the role of the human and the Soul as an object of worship, in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity, intentions and correspondingly their absence from, among others, our own and, through us, others’ all idolatrous figures, acts, intentions, designs, patterns, habits, as well as from those who pray to us as to gods, to deities, to beings not of this world, to masters, Saints, to the enlightened, to astral beings; as well as from those treating us, or others, as intermediaries to God, intermediaries to all deities, goddesses; as well as from those worshipping us, praising us, adoring us; as well as from those who pray for us to deities, goddesses, extraterrestrials in our name, in our matters, for our good, and correspondingly from those who curse us in prayers, cast curses and spells, who want to take revenge in all ways and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

25. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all, among others, varieties, associations, groups, circles, ideological, ritual and operational currents, among others demonic, satanic, Luciferian, war-related, military, magical, black-magical, tantric, black-tantric, white-astral, flame groups, the Left-Hand Path, as well as from, among others, battle shock, from pogroms, turmoil, from black suns, necromancers, beings of gloom, beings of darkness, forces of evil, demons, rulers of hells, guardian devils, Cainites, Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Kali, strzygas, beings and Souls that have fallen, horned, rebellious, deceitful, aggressive beings, filled with pride, egoism and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

26. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from all kinds, sizes, races, meanings and genders of conditions connected with sexuality, drive, role and behavior, including, among others, sex addicts, lesbians, gays, transvestites, rapists, sadomasochists, celibates, eunuchs, brothel madams, pimps, prostitutes, deviants, perverts, pedophiles, zoophiles, coprophiles, coprophages, incestuous persons, pansexuals, hormonal cycles, from inbreeding and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

27. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this because of, among others, our and others’ actions connected with the End of the World, in the period of 2012, with other Ends of the World, with the search for God and ultimate meaning, with Apocalypses, Armageddons, with the ends of civilizations, epochs, orders, with our and God’s actions in the area of the cosmic egg and during subsequent Aeons, with creating or blocking extraordinary actions, as well as through cyclical resetting of meanings, responsibility and identity in the face of an expected or postponing end, new beginning or rebirths and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

28. and our own, and through us other people’s, from all causes and by all means, and experiencing relationships with women through tension between the desire for closeness and the fear that male energy itself will be perceived as threatening, too strong, too direct or inappropriate, and withdrawing from our own masculinity, sexuality, agency and right to take initiative in order not to hurt, frighten, embarrass or dominate anyone and not to repeat other men’s faults; respectively surrendering to God the belief that male desire is by nature guilty, dirty, dangerous or unworthy of love; respectively being a man who feels that his male body, psyche and way of reacting are not his home but a burden, prison, armour, mask or foreign construction imposed upon the Soul, as a result of which he experiences tension between who he is internally and what his sex, family, women, father, mother, culture, religion or society expect of him; respectively functioning within a pattern in which a man tries to diminish, hide, disarm or neutralise his masculinity in order to become safer for others, more acceptable, less visible, less suspicious, less burdensome or less similar to those men whom he himself fears or despises; respectively experiencing the male role as an obligation to carry burdens, earn money, protect, fight, decide, be strong, unshaken, sexually capable, a source of psychological support and at the same time someone who has no right to weakness, confusion, softness or his own suffering; respectively carrying within himself the sense that a man must always prove something: that he is not weak, that he is not dangerous, that he is not guilty, that he is not a failure, that he is not like his father, grandfather, drunkards, abusers or fallen men of the lineage; respectively surrendering to God the belief that masculinity is a task impossible to fulfil without losing oneself; respectively being a man who experiences himself as someone born on the wrong side of the conflict between the sexes, on the side that is viewed with suspicion, blamed, requiring control, correction, upbringing, weakening or psychological castration, feeling that women, mothers, partners, society or his own conscience expect from him not so much mature masculinity as masculinity that is harmless, disarmed, subordinated and constantly explaining its own existence; respectively functioning within a field in which a man may relinquish his own strength, boundaries, anger, sexuality, ambition, agency and voice in order not to be regarded as aggressive, selfish, domineering, primitive or similar to men who once harmed others; respectively recognising that internal rejection of masculinity may lead to withdrawal, helplessness, excessive apologising for oneself, sexual freezing, fear of women, dependence on the opinions of others, difficulty taking action or living below one’s own strength; respectively accepting that a man can be strong without violence, sexual without abuse, assertive without domination, present without being threatening, responsible without self-annihilation and masculine without shame; respectively surrendering to God all separation between masculinity, the body, sexuality, responsibility, strength, tenderness, safety, dignity and a man’s right to full existence, with the intention of restoring their mutual harmony, across all dimensions, times and not only, all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from, among others, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence from, among others, our Soul, our entire being and not only, as well as from being healthy or physically ill, energetically stable or unstable or mentally-psychically ill, curably ill, or chronically, or incurably ill, as well as from being disabled persons, persons with injuries, persons ailing, directly ill or having symptoms or karmic effects, inbred effects, among others, of various diseases, ailments, infirmities, from genetic, epigenetic, environmental burdens and not only, and experiencing that which is our own and, through us, caused in others, all effects of this

Opublikowano: 07/08/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: A woman and a man in mutual relations

Komentarze