A Human Being’s Wealth and the Possessions of Their Soul Are Not the Same Thing

When putting one’s own material matters in order, it would be appropriate to turn to God for clarification as to what the actual state of disposal of resources, property and finances is on the part of one’s own Soul. It may turn out that while we have an empty wallet, the Soul may be quite rich and may have considerable income from all kinds of activities, not necessarily in accordance with God’s will, and often acting destructively or feeding off other people.

Just as we in the material world may be possessors of various material goods, so Souls may also possess all kinds of goods that they collected in their previous incarnations, or while conducting various astral businesses.

The property at the Soul’s disposal may be entirely different from what its earthly avatar observes on a daily basis. While being a king, tyrant or bandit one could become quite wealthy in one incarnation, while being a deity, a saint or a media figure one can “earn” from one’s own name for many centuries.

For example, if a previous incarnation became a saint, a national hero, or a well-known media figure, then, aside from issues of idolatry, it is possible that one’s own brand came into being, for the use of which others must pay the owner. A famous name may appear, for instance, in the name of a street, park, mountain, island, any product, alcohol, games, toys, various gadgets, objects, vehicles, cities, states, bodies of water, or anything else.

Just as we people must pay for the use of a brand name, logo, image or trademark, or have the owner’s consent, buy a license, or pay tribute, so one should similarly assume that the matter stands in the case of our Souls.

The days of the week in contemporary Nordic-Germanic languages are named after gods. Regardless of whether the famous name appearing in a given name (for example Saint Anne’s Mountain, Wyspiański Street, Jan III Sobieski cigarettes, Lady Walewska cake, Garibaldi Square, etc.) indicates ownership or only the making available of one’s own name, it would still testify to the benefits drawn by the Soul from a given matter. While it does not raise doubts that using one’s name for alcohol, stimulants and drugs is destructive activity, it is no longer exactly known what the effects are of a Soul owning streets, squares or schools with the avatar’s name in their name, and whether the Soul perhaps does not sell tickets of प्रवेश to other Souls for entering a given place.

Let us assume that someone, as a result of war and the shedding of others’ blood, seized some land by force and then gave it a name—for example the name of his own wife, the name of a favorite saint, or deity—and thus a new name for the area came into being. The question is whether the new owner does not charge astral fees for: incarnating on “his” land, climate fees, fees for passing through, for damaging the lawn in a meadow, for littering the area, for grazing cows on “his” meadow, for passing over bridges, through gates, entering temples, sightseeing in the city, traveling, or breathing the air or using the sun, etc. These issues may seem amusing, but since we humans care for our own property and make sure that our neighbors do not litter it, do not violate our ownership rights, or else pay for damage caused, why should a similar situation not take place with our Souls, if they feel themselves to be owners?

The question is what God thinks of such ownership rights or of profiting from the name of an avatar who in reality, as a soldier in war, killed hundreds of people, or as a ruler started a war, or as a beautiful actress drew to herself for astral sex a numerous crowd of male Souls. And how does God relate to the fact that some person, for example Stefan, proclaimed himself a god?

Wherever one looks, we have some names and given designations for all material matters, and none of us knows what share our Souls have in this and what benefits they draw in the astral realm and what they are really owners of, nor do we likewise know how much, for what, and to whom our Souls must pay.

A Soul may have dozens of its own temples, while in the material world its avatar may have no house of its own for the family. A Soul may be a well-known astral “businessman,” not necessarily honest and not acting for the good of others, while its earthly avatar may simultaneously be unemployed or work for a starvation wage.

Let us assume that the Soul desired to have its own river or its own star, went to God and in His goodness He fulfilled its wish. Let us assume that it then began to collect tribute for swimming in the river, for the fact that the Souls of fish may live there, for the rain that raised the water level in the river, or for all sorts of other matters that would seem absurd. The question is also what the profits from such practices are spent on and whether they are not used for destructive purposes. The earthly avatar may desire to have an ordinary house in material reality and somehow this seems impossible to fulfill, while in the meantime his Soul may hold entire states in possession—so why would God give it yet another small house, since it—the Soul—already has an entire state, numerous temples, or its own star shining in the sky. And moreover uses these benefits to the detriment of others? Here then arises the issue of submitting the Soul’s financial status and the effects of using wealth to divine verification and audit. It may turn out that, for example, after receiving a house from God, the Soul together with the avatar decided that it would be more profitable to make it into a brothel than to live there with the family.

God is generous and one should assume that He generously endowed our Souls. The question is what use the Souls made of this divine generosity and what negative effects came into being and persist, since at present only an empty wallet remains for the avatar in material reality. The Soul may even want in the present earthly incarnation to experience wealth again, but God, together with other Souls, may have an entire list of arguments and evidence showing how much the Soul already possesses and what negative outcomes came of it. Therefore, out of concern for further confusion (and seeing its patterns and intentions), He may refuse the Soul—until understanding and a change of intention—to grant further gifts, even simply because of vows of poverty that may influence the quick loss of prosperity and even greater suffering.

Another issue is that the Soul may have amassed wealth as a result of acting on behalf of various living gods, astral rulers, or may have obtained it from wealthier astral “business sharks” (or as a result of assignment), which inevitably brings many additional karmic problems, dependencies, or even debt-collection matters.

Author: Małgorzata Krata

Opublikowano: 29/03/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: Money and freedom from poverty

Komentarze